OU Portal
Log In
Welcome
Applicants
Z6_60GI02O0O8IDC0QEJUJ26TJDI4
Error:
Javascript is disabled in this browser. This page requires Javascript. Modify your browser's settings to allow Javascript to execute. See your browser's documentation for specific instructions.
{}
Close
Publikační činnost
Probíhá načítání, čekejte prosím...
publicationId :
tempRecordId :
actionDispatchIndex :
navigationBranch :
pageMode :
tabSelected :
isRivValid :
Record type:
stať ve sborníku (D)
Home Department:
Ústav pro výzkum a aplikace fuzzy modelování (94410)
Title:
A Comparison of Adaptive Differential Evolution Algorithms on CEC 2013 Benchmark Problems
Citace
Tvrdík, J., Bujok, P. a Poláková, R. A Comparison of Adaptive Differential Evolution Algorithms on CEC 2013 Benchmark Problems.
In:
19th International Conference on Soft Computing MENDEL 2013.
Brno: Brno University of Technology, 2013. Brno University of Technology, 2013. s. 123-128. ISBN 978-802144540-6.
Subtitle
Publication year:
2013
Obor:
Informatika
Number of pages:
6
Page from:
123
Page to:
128
Form of publication:
Tištená verze
ISBN code:
978-802144540-6
ISSN code:
1803-3814
Proceedings title:
19th International Conference on Soft Computing MENDEL 2013
Proceedings:
Mezinárodní
Publisher name:
Brno University of Technology
Place of publishing:
Brno
Country of Publication:
Sborník vydaný v ČR
Název konference:
19th International Conference on Soft Computing MENDEL 2013
Conference venue:
Brno
Datum zahájení konference:
Typ akce podle státní
příslušnosti účastníků:
Celosvětová akce
WoS code:
EID:
Key words in English:
Single-objective optimization, adaptive differential evolution, CEC 2013 functions
Annotation in original language:
Four adaptive variants of differential evolution algorithm, namely JADE, EPSDE, CoDE, and b6e6rl variant of competitive differential evolution, were compared experimentally in CEC 2013 benchmark suite of 28 functions at dimension $D=30$. The results show that all the algorithms in comparison are not efficient in the problems with rotated objective function, whilst their efficiency on unrotated functions is better. There are statistically significant differences in the efficiency of the algorithms. JADE was mostly the best performing, CoDE the worst. The failure of the adaptive differential evolution in the problems with rotated objective function should be studied in more details.
Annotation in english language:
References
Reference
R01:
RIV/61988987:17610/13:A14017T3
Complementary Content
Deferred Modules
${title}
${badge}
${loading}
Deferred Modules
Probíhá načítání, čekejte prosím...