Publ3 search

Z6_60GI02O0O8IDC0QEJUJ26TJDI4

Error:

Javascript is disabled in this browser. This page requires Javascript. Modify your browser's settings to allow Javascript to execute. See your browser's documentation for specific instructions.

Publikační činnost

Probíhá načítání, čekejte prosím...

Record type:	kapitola v odborné knize (C)
Home Department:	Katedra filozofie (25100)
Title:	Why I Say “Totalitarian Regimes”: A Response to Totalitarianism Denial
Citace	Tucker, A. M. Why I Say “Totalitarian Regimes”: A Response to Totalitarianism Denial. In: Manuela Ungureanu (ed.). Rethinking the Historiography of the Soviet Bloc: The Totalitarianism Paradigm and Institutional Practices under Communism. 1. vyd. New York: Berghahn, 2026. s. 145-162. ISBN 978-1-83695-352-4.

Subtitle
Publication year:	2026
Obor:
Form of publication:	Tištená verze
ISBN code:	978-1-83695-352-4
Book title in original language:	Rethinking the Historiography of the Soviet Bloc: The Totalitarianism Paradigm and Institutional Practices under Communism
Title of the edition and volume number:	neuvedeno
Place of publishing:	New York
Publisher name:	Berghahn
Issue reference (issue number):	1.:
Published:	v zahraničí
Author of the source document:	Manuela Ungureanu (ed.)
Number of pages:	18
Book page count:	502
Page from:	145
Page to:	162
Book print run:
EID:

Key words in English:	historiography, totalitarian regimes, communism
Annotation in original language:	A Slovenian jester asked rhetorically, “Did someone say totalitarianism?!” The comedian replied to his rhetorical question with a parody of the dialectical identity of opposites, applying the slippery slope of logical fallacy that moves concepts step by step from one extreme to another (e.g., if ten is approximately nine, as nine is approximately eight, and so on, the fallacy concludes gradually that ten equals negative ten), to reach an Orwellian conclusion that the totalitarian idea creates space for potential freedom, and that the concept of totalitarianism is used to suppress dissent.
Annotation in english language:	A Slovenian jester asked rhetorically, “Did someone say totalitarianism?!” The comedian replied to his rhetorical question with a parody of the dialectical identity of opposites, applying the slippery slope of logical fallacy that moves concepts step by step from one extreme to another (e.g., if ten is approximately nine, as nine is approximately eight, and so on, the fallacy concludes gradually that ten equals negative ten), to reach an Orwellian conclusion that the totalitarian idea creates space for potential freedom, and that the concept of totalitarianism is used to suppress dissent.

References

Reference

R01:

Complementary Content

${loading}