OU Portal
Log In
Welcome
Applicants
Z6_60GI02O0O8IDC0QEJUJ26TJDI4
>
Publ3 search
Error:
Javascript is disabled in this browser. This page requires Javascript. Modify your browser's settings to allow Javascript to execute. See your browser's documentation for specific instructions.
{}
Close
Publikační činnost
Probíhá načítání, čekejte prosím...
publicationId :
tempRecordId :
actionDispatchIndex :
navigationBranch :
pageMode :
tabSelected :
isRivValid :
Record type:
stať ve sborníku (D)
Home Department:
Katedra studií lidského pohybu (45050)
Title:
EFFECT OF HEAD POSITION ON CENTRE OF MASS VARIABILITY DURING HANDSTAND: PRELIMINARY RESULTS
Citace
Farana, R., Brtva, P. a Irwin, G. EFFECT OF HEAD POSITION ON CENTRE OF MASS VARIABILITY DURING HANDSTAND: PRELIMINARY RESULTS.
In:
41st International Conference on Biomechanics in Sport, Milwaukee: ISBS Proceedings Archive 2023-07-11 Marquette University in Milwaukee, WI USA.
s. 1-4.
Subtitle
Publication year:
2023
Obor:
Number of pages:
4
Page from:
1
Page to:
4
Form of publication:
Elektronická verze
ISBN code:
neuvedeno
ISSN code:
Proceedings title:
ISBS Proceedings Archive
Proceedings:
Mezinárodní
Publisher name:
neuvedeno
Place of publishing:
neuvedeno
Country of Publication:
Název konference:
41st International Conference on Biomechanics in Sport, Milwaukee
Místo konání konference:
Marquette University in Milwaukee, WI USA
Datum zahájení konference:
Typ akce podle státní
příslušnosti účastníků:
Celosvětová akce
WoS code:
EID:
Key words in English:
balance, handstand, kinematics, variability
Annotation in original language:
The aims of this study were: a) to determine to determine the change in joint angle kinematic variability during the handstand with different head positions, and b) to determine the contributions made by wrist, shoulder, and hip joint angles variability on CoM variability in handstand. Four young active female gymnasts performed 3 trials of handstands with three head positions (normal, straight, and flexed). 3D kinematics were collected for each trial. Statistical differences were analysed using One-way ANOVA and effect sizes (ES) reported. Forward stepwise regression was carried out between CoM variability and joint angle variability. The prevalent control strategies were at the shoulder with straight and flexed head position, and hip strategy in normal head position.
Annotation in english language:
References
Reference
R01:
Complementary Content
Deferred Modules
${title}
${badge}
${loading}
Deferred Modules