OU Portal
Log In
Welcome
Applicants
Z6_60GI02O0O8IDC0QEJUJ26TJDI4
Error:
Javascript is disabled in this browser. This page requires Javascript. Modify your browser's settings to allow Javascript to execute. See your browser's documentation for specific instructions.
{}
Close
Publikační činnost
Probíhá načítání, čekejte prosím...
publicationId :
tempRecordId :
actionDispatchIndex :
navigationBranch :
pageMode :
tabSelected :
isRivValid :
Record type:
kapitola v odborné knize (C)
Home Department:
Katedra anglistiky a amerikanistiky (25400)
Title:
‘He ain’t never gonna be shit’: Cancel Culture and the Functions of Hashtags #NameIsCanceled or #NameIsOverParty
Citace
Beneš Kováčová, D. ‘He ain’t never gonna be shit’: Cancel Culture and the Functions of Hashtags #NameIsCanceled or #NameIsOverParty.
In:
Sanna-Kaisa Tanskanen, Lotta Lehti, Kristin V. Lexander, Mikko T. Virtanen, Chaoqun Xie (ed.).
Explorations in Internet Pragmatics: Intentionality, Identity, and Interpersonal Interaction.
1. vyd. Leiden: Brill, 2024. s. 45-66. Series: Studies in Pragmatics, Volume: 23. ISBN 978-90-04-69442-2.
Subtitle
Publication year:
2024
Obor:
Form of publication:
Tištená verze
ISBN code:
978-90-04-69442-2
Book title in original language:
Explorations in Internet Pragmatics: Intentionality, Identity, and Interpersonal Interaction
Title of the edition and volume number:
Series: Studies in Pragmatics, Volume: 23
Place of publishing:
Leiden
Publisher name:
Brill
Issue reference (issue number):
1:
Published:
v zahraničí
Author of the source document:
Sanna-Kaisa Tanskanen, Lotta Lehti, Kristin V. Lexander, Mikko T. Virtanen, Chaoqun Xie (ed.)
Number of pages:
22
Book page count:
294
Page from:
45
Page to:
66
Book print run:
EID:
Key words in English:
cancel culture; Twitter; hashtags; James Charles; felicity conditions; illocutionary force; performatives
Annotation in original language:
While previous studies (e.g., Scott 2015) found that hashtags can be employed in social media posts to guide the readers’ inferential processes, their linguistic role in the context of cancel culture has so far remained unexplored. Therefore, this chapter aims to fill in this gap and show that the hashtags #NameIsCanceled and #NameIsOverParty play an important role in signaling the illocutionary force of the post and that the posts containing these hashtags can—under certain conditions—be analyzed as performative speech acts. To these aims, the study focuses on one of the most intense cases of online shaming, namely the cancelation of beauty YouTuber James Charles. By analyzing a dataset of tweets containing the hashtag #JamesCharlesIsCanceled or #JamesCharlesIsOverParty, the study argues that posters employ these hashtags strategically to perform the act of canceling, while increasing the visibility of their post and garnering attention of other users. Tweeters thereby engage in ambient affiliation (Zappavigna 2011) and bond around a shared goal—to ‘cancel’ Charles. This is reflected in the impoliteness of their tweets and the accompanying (audio-)visual material, which typically depicts the posters’ performance of the cancelation (e.g., unsubscribing from the cancelee’s social media accounts).
Annotation in english language:
While previous studies (e.g., Scott 2015) found that hashtags can be employed in social media posts to guide the readers’ inferential processes, their linguistic role in the context of cancel culture has so far remained unexplored. Therefore, this chapter aims to fill in this gap and show that the hashtags #NameIsCanceled and #NameIsOverParty play an important role in signaling the illocutionary force of the post and that the posts containing these hashtags can—under certain conditions—be analyzed as performative speech acts. To these aims, the study focuses on one of the most intense cases of online shaming, namely the cancelation of beauty YouTuber James Charles. By analyzing a dataset of tweets containing the hashtag #JamesCharlesIsCanceled or #JamesCharlesIsOverParty, the study argues that posters employ these hashtags strategically to perform the act of canceling, while increasing the visibility of their post and garnering attention of other users. Tweeters thereby engage in ambient affiliation (Zappavigna 2011) and bond around a shared goal—to ‘cancel’ Charles. This is reflected in the impoliteness of their tweets and the accompanying (audio-)visual material, which typically depicts the posters’ performance of the cancelation (e.g., unsubscribing from the cancelee’s social media accounts).
References
Reference
R01:
Complementary Content
Deferred Modules
${title}
${badge}
${loading}
Deferred Modules