OU Portal
Log In
Welcome
Applicants
Z6_60GI02O0O8IDC0QEJUJ26TJDI4
Error:
Javascript is disabled in this browser. This page requires Javascript. Modify your browser's settings to allow Javascript to execute. See your browser's documentation for specific instructions.
{}
Zavřít
Publikační činnost
Probíhá načítání, čekejte prosím...
publicationId :
tempRecordId :
actionDispatchIndex :
navigationBranch :
pageMode :
tabSelected :
isRivValid :
Typ záznamu:
stať ve sborníku (D)
Domácí pracoviště:
Ústav klinické farmakologie (11560)
Název:
Comparison of Mw\Pharm 3.30 (DOS) and Mw\Pharm plus plus (Windows) Versions of Pharmacokinetic Software for PK/PD Monitoring of Vancomycin for dialyzed patients
Citace
Kořístková, B., Vavrečková, E., Hricová, M., Kacířová, I., Brozmanová, H. a Grundmann, M. Comparison of Mw\Pharm 3.30 (DOS) and Mw\Pharm plus plus (Windows) Versions of Pharmacokinetic Software for PK/PD Monitoring of Vancomycin for dialyzed patients.
In:
15th Congress of the European Association for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics (EACPT): The Abstracts 2022-06-25 Atény.
SPRINGER HEIDELBERG, 2022. s. 138-138. ISSN 0031-6970.
Podnázev
Rok vydání:
2022
Obor:
Počet stran:
1
Strana od:
138
Strana do:
138
Forma vydání:
Elektronická verze
Kód ISBN:
neuvedeno
Kód ISSN:
0031-6970
Název sborníku:
The Abstracts
Sborník:
Mezinárodní
Název nakladatele:
SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
Místo vydání:
neuvedeno
Stát vydání:
Sborník vydaný v zahraničí
Název konference:
15th Congress of the European Association for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics (EACPT)
Místo konání konference:
Atény
Datum zahájení konference:
Typ akce podle státní
příslušnosti účastníků akce:
Celosvětová akce
Kód UT WoS:
000815076100285
EID:
Klíčová slova anglicky:
Mw\Pharm software, PK/PD modelling, therapeutic drug monitoring , vancomycin, dialysis
Popis v původním jazyce:
Introduction: For a long time, the Mw\Pharm software suite (MEDI\WARE, Prague, Czech Republic / Groningen, Netherlands) has been used for PK/PD modelling in therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Objective: The aim of this study was to find the best model in the newer Windows version of Mw\Pharm++ 1.3.5.558 (WIN) for patient on intermittent hemodialysis. Methods: Twenty-two adult patients with mean age 65±15 years, body weight 88±25 kg, were repeatedly examined for vancomycin. Cmin and concentration before hemodialysis (CBH) predicted by Windows models “vancomycin_dialysis_c2 “ (WINd), ”vancomycin_adult_C2“ (WINa), and DOS 3.30 models ” vancomycin (dialysis)“ (DOSd), ”vancomycin adult“ (DOSa) were compared with the with the measured value and with DOSd model. Statistics: Percentage prediction error (%PE) calculated as (predicted–measured)/measured or (predicted-DOSd)/DOSd, RMSE, Blandt-Altman bias, Pearson’s coefficient of rank correlation (R), Student’s t-test. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism version 5.00 for Windows. Results: Models WINd and DOSd produced better Cmin prediction then respective adult models. DOSd model produced lower %PE, BlandtAltman bias and Pearson R, while slightly higher RMSE than WINd model. CBH prediction (available only in 7 cases) was better by WINa compared to WINd, while similar by DOSa and DOSd (Table 1). WINd and DOSd models use higher population V1 and Clm while lower fr than WINa and DOSa models (Table 2). V1, k12 were higher, while k21 was lower in all models than respective population data. Clm was higher in DOSa, while lower in WINa and fixed in WINd. Fr was lower in WINa and DOSa. Conclusion: DOS and WIN models are not identical despite similar name and the same population data. Dialysed models should be use for TDM in dialysed patients. DOSd model produced the best prediction while WINd was poorer. Implementation of DOSd model into WIN version of MW\Pharm is recommended.
Popis v anglickém jazyce:
Seznam ohlasů
Ohlas
R01:
RIV/61988987:17110/22:A2302G75
Complementary Content
Deferred Modules
${title}
${badge}
${loading}
Deferred Modules