OU Portal
Log In
Welcome
Applicants
Z6_60GI02O0O8IDC0QEJUJ26TJDI4
Error:
Javascript is disabled in this browser. This page requires Javascript. Modify your browser's settings to allow Javascript to execute. See your browser's documentation for specific instructions.
{}
Close
Publikační činnost
Probíhá načítání, čekejte prosím...
publicationId :
tempRecordId :
actionDispatchIndex :
navigationBranch :
pageMode :
tabSelected :
isRivValid :
Record type:
stať ve sborníku (D)
Home Department:
Katedra psychologie (25700)
Title:
Indicating dating accuracy by personal events ratings: Differences between self-reports and proxy-reports
Citace
Neusar, A. a van der Vaart, W. Indicating dating accuracy by personal events ratings: Differences between self-reports and proxy-reports.
In:
PhD existence 2018: PhD existence 2018. ?Nekonečno v psychologii?. Česko-slovenská psychologická konference (nejen) pro doktorandy a o doktorandech 2018 Olomouc.
Olomouc: Univerzita Palackého., 2018. s. 69-78. ISBN 978-80-244-5339-2.
Subtitle
Publication year:
2018
Obor:
Number of pages:
20
Page from:
69
Page to:
78
Form of publication:
Elektronická verze
ISBN code:
978-80-244-5339-2
ISSN code:
Proceedings title:
PhD existence 2018. ?Nekonečno v psychologii?. Česko-slovenská psychologická konference (nejen) pro doktorandy a o doktorandech.
Proceedings:
Mezinárodní
Publisher name:
Univerzita Palackého.
Place of publishing:
Olomouc
Country of Publication:
Sborník vydaný v ČR
Název konference:
PhD existence 2018
Místo konání konference:
Olomouc
Datum zahájení konference:
Typ akce podle státní
příslušnosti účastníků:
Evropská akce
WoS code:
000510150800008
EID:
Key words in English:
event dating, accuracy, proxy agreement, interpersonal knowledge, personal events
Annotation in original language:
Quality of self-reports and proxy reports for personal events are examined. 78 couples (age 23 to 40 years old) were separately interviewed and provided the ratings of 22 or less events. The role of one partner (respondent) was to date personal events (exact date) and also to provide ratings of subjective characteristics such as confidence in date estimate, event importance or amount of sharing the event. The role of the other partner (proxy) was to keep an online diary (for six weeks) about events from their partner’s life (or life of the whole family) and provide the same ratings but from their partner’s perspective. The results show similarities and differences of both reports suggesting that proxies’ have some valuable interpersonal knowledge of unique personal events of their partners, though this knowledge is usually quite limited and only occasionally superior—e.g., may not suffer from social desirability as much as respondents’ reports.
Annotation in english language:
References
Reference
R01:
RIV/61988987:17250/18:A2202EAJ
Complementary Content
Deferred Modules
${title}
${badge}
${loading}
Deferred Modules